Sentence examples for mean group effects from inspiring English sources

Assessing microarray data for both mean group effects and individual effects can lead to more robust findings in psychiatric genetics.

Had this family undergone post-mortem microarray analysis as a part of a larger sample of subjects, EVA would have detected the MAOA decrease in expression whereas microarray analysis using mean group effects would not have.

y i  = phenotypes pre-adjusted for the mean and contemporary group effects for each trait, k = number of marker loci fit in the analysis, z ij  = allelic state (AA = 10, AB = 0, BB = −10) of animal i at marker j, u j  = random additive effect for marker j, and e i  = residual.

The method is meant to capture group effects without being too sensitive to anomalies in a small subset of subjects.

There was also no difference in the variability of cup choices between the groups as measured by mean vector length, group effect, F 1, 10) = 1.2, p =.3; Group × Session interaction, F(15, 150) = 0.58; p =.8.

A comparison between the mean within-group effect size and the mean between-groups effect size enabled us to examine the potential existence of an overestimation of the treatment effects with the within-group effect sizes.

Though analyses of travel times to non-VA hospitals also yielded significant group effects, means were low and differed little.

The results based on the mean group estimator with common correlated effects suggest (a) a stable relation between energy consumption and output; (b) bi-directional causality in both long- and short-run; and (c) the robustness of the long-run causality results to the inclusion of additional variables.

The main discrepancy was found in disability outcomes, where the mean between-groups effect size was clearly lower (0.359) than the mean within-group one (0.742).

Participants' ratings of certainty of abuse (detection) and selected actions (prevention) were correlated with the experts' ratings of the same cases at each stage of testing, as well as examining effect on mean group scores and cue use.

The mean inter-group effect size (Cohen's d) across intervention levels was 0.38; specifically 0.38 and 0.35 for parenting and child behavior problems, respectively.