Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Mean glycaemic control, as reflected by HbA1c, was suboptimal at 7.79 (1.32)% (62 (10) mmol/mol).
Mean glycaemic control, as reflected by HbA1c, was suboptimal at 62 (11) mmol/mol.
Mean glycaemic control, as reflected by current HbA1c, was suboptimal at 7.9 (1.6)% (normal value: 4.0-6.0%).
Similar(57)
Furthermore, two recent publications comparably concluded that SMBG can very well be an effective means of glycaemic control in insulin-naive patients if used in a structured and knowledgeable way [ 43, 44].
The rationale for this design was to make the results more applicable to regular clinic care in which educational activities such as group meetings can be offered as a means to improve glycaemic control.
9 Patients with type 2 diabetes using oral agents to treat diabetes in seven European countries had similar glycaemic control (mean HbA1c7.2%%).
Those who gained more than 5 kg over this time had better glycaemic control (mean HbA1c difference of 0.2%) than those with less or no weight gain but also had raised BP, LDL-C and triacylglycerol in association with lower HDL-C (differences that remained significant after adjustment for glycaemic control).
Sensitivity analyses showed that the magnitude of improvement in HbA1c was greatest in patients with the poorest glycaemic control (mean adjusted decreases of 0.57 and 1.07% in type 1, and 0.47 and 0.97% in type 2 diabetes patients with baseline HbA1c levels ≥ 8% and ≥ 10%, respectively) (Table 2), and comparable with that reported in trials of patients newly commencing insulin therapy [ 32].
Therefore other means to improve glycaemic control are urgently needed.
Therefore prevention of these complications, by means of strict glycaemic control, is of major importance in the management of type 1 diabetes [ 3].
For example, Nayak et al. undertook a prospective study in 174 consecutive obese patients (mean BMI 43 kg/m) with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control (mean HbA1c8.8%%) 47.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com