Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We also employed Jorde and Ryman's (1995, 1996) computational method to estimate values for C = 40.37 and G = 9.03 from the razorback life table (Turner et al. 2007), where C is a correction factor for overlapping generations and G is mean generation length.
Similar(11)
The modeled populations are constant in size, so E (k ¯ ) = 2, in which case the generational effective size for the population is given by N e ≈ 4 N 1 Gen V k + 2 (1)(Hill 1972, equation 16), where Gen = generation length = mean age of parents of a newborn cohort.
1 average survival time 2 median survival time 3 maximum survival 4 mean total egg rafts produced per female 5 net reproduction rate 6 mean generation time 7 population growth rate Mean wing lengths between replicates and among groups were statistically similar for all individual comparisons (p > 0.05, t-test).
Generation length estimated as 6 years (G. Engelhard, pers. comm).. F values are mean estimates for ages 5 13 from Engelhard and Heino (2004), Fig. 1B.
We assumed a generation length of 4 years for NSH [ 40] and for RIN ELW we estimated the mean age of reproduction to be 2.92 (~3) years based on unpublished data from scale readings, and used this value as a proxy for generation length.
Generation length estimated as 6.56 years, calculated from the formula A50 + 1/ M, where A50 is the mean age at maturity between 1965 and 1993 (3.7), and M = 0.35 (Mohn and Simon 2002).
Generation length unknown.
Mean generation times were 40.3 ± 1.2 min.
The rate of L50 change in haldanes was estimated in standard deviations per generation using coefficients in the equation (5) (Hendry and Kinnison 1999): where x2 and x1 were the mean trait values at two different times, SDpooled was the pooled standard deviation, and g was the number of generation (years divided by generation length).
Generation length estimated as 9 years (COSEWIC 2003).
Generation length estimated as 10.8 years (NEFSC 2002).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com