Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
In the 1970s, 1,220 captured shortnose sturgeon had a mean fork length of 645 mm while 4,310 sturgeon recorded at the same location in the 1990s had a mean fork length of 663 mm.
No length differences were detected between treatments (mean fork length, ANOVA, F 1,22) = 0.07, p = 0.78).
The mean fork length and mass of the hatchery-reared fish were 12.3±0.8 cm and 19.6±3.8 g, whereas the naturally-reared fish were 11.2±1.2 cm long and 13.9±4.4 g.
Mean fork length and body mass for Baikal omul were 27.5 cm (SD = 3.1 cm) and 235 g (SD = 21 g), respectively.
Mean fork length and body mass for Baikal whitefish were 34.5 cm (SD = 2.9 cm) and 489 g (SD = 28.5 g).
Sampling locations, dates of collection, sample sizes for microsatellites analyses, mtDNA lineage (highlighted either by sequencing or multiplex COI haplotype-specific PCR), mean fork length (mm) and gonadosomatic index (GSI) data for the M. cephalus from Taiwan are shown in Table 2. Muscle tissues were preserved in 95% ethanol prior to DNA extraction.
Similar(53)
Significant differences were detected in mean fork lengths among UA and FA groups for both species in all three farming areas (Table 1).
The average fork length of the tagged smolts was 130±3 mm (125 141 mm).
Otolith derived changes in mean values of fork length estimated means (Fem), and thereby growth, were assessed from the periods 1982 1989 and 1995 2003, respectively.
Four tissues, liver, gills, head kidney and intestine, were sampled April 28th 2006 from a total of 20 Atlantic salmon with an average body mass of 381 ± 85 g and body length 33.9 ± 2.6 cm (fork length, mean ± S.D .. Average condition factor (c.f. = weight/length-3) was 0.96 ± 0.10 (mean ± S.D .. Tissue samples were dissected out as fast as possible, and immediately frozen in liquefied nitrogen.
The population means of the individual fork length estimates were tested by an ANOVA test [22] and plotted with corresponding standard errors of the estimate for each year.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com