Sentence examples for mean fold difference from inspiring English sources

After 3, 7 and 10 days in culture, there was a significant difference in ASM cell number compared with baseline counts (day 0) in both non-asthmatic [day 10 mean fold difference (95% CI); 4 (2.43–6.52); P=0.0005; n=7] and asthmatic ASM cells [day 10 mean fold difference (95% CI); 5.86 (3.16 10.84); P=0.0004; n=7; Fig. 1a].

The unique molecular signature of ACP was defined as genes that showed significant differential expression in all of the pair-wise comparisons (FDR ≤0.1 and mean fold difference ≥1.5) and for which the mean difference was in the same direction when compared with all of the other clusters (i.e., either all upregulated or all downregulated in all of the comparisons with respect to ACP).

To further investigate the relationship of measures of expression for contigs and their respective clusters, we identified contigs whose ratio of expression (formally, the greatest mean fold difference of component ESTs that were significantly differently expressed between the L1 and iL3 samples) was greater than or equal to two.

To further investigate the relationship of measures of expression for contigs and their respective clusters, we identified contigs that had the greatest difference in their ratio of expression (formally, the greatest mean fold difference of component ESTs that were significantly differently expressed) between the L2 direct and indirect stages, with a two or more-fold difference in expression.

AR expression was greater in tumour relative to normal in 7 of 10 patients (Mean fold difference = 4.2, p = 0.07 for paired t-test).

Counts were performed using a Coulter counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and are represented as mean fold difference in cell number after treatment.

In general, the direction of change in mRNA levels agreed completely with the microarray analysis, but with larger mean fold differences (Figure 3A and Table S2).

Mean fold differences and standard errors were calculated.

The reaction norms for the different clusters were based on gene expression mean fold change difference between any two groups compared.

For all shRNA replicates, these values were used to calculate mean difference (equivalent to mean fold change in log scale), strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD) and P value of testing no mean difference [30], [31], [32].

Separately, for both datasets, we delineated transcripts associated with the presence or absence of metastasis; only transcripts with a mean fold change difference > 2 and with a P < 0.05 (student's t-test) were selected.