Sentence examples for mean fluorescence index from inspiring English sources

Results of the complement binding assay are presented as a mean fluorescence index [FI (Fluorescent Index), proportion of positive bacteria expressed as a percentage multiplied by the geometric mean MFI] in arbitary units [12], [17], [18].

Complement component 5a receptor (C5aR) from the neutrophil cell surface, was also decreased after ECLS initiation (ratio of mean fluorescence index 0.73 ± 0.22 on day one, p = 0.03) which is a sign of complement-induced neutrophil dysfunction in septic patients.

Results were calculated as mean fluorescence index (MFI) [6], which is the geometric mean multiplied by the percentage of positive cells.

As shown in Fig. 6A, Gfi1−/− progenitor B cells at Hardy fractions D and E showed a higher mean fluorescence index of IL7Rα compared to Gfi1+/+ control cells.

The difference in the mean fluorescence index (MFI) of CD28 between the CD28Lo and CD28Hi T cells was significant (Figure 1C; P<0.0001C.

The mean fluorescence index of the LL37-treated cells was compared with that of the control cells (no LL-37 treatment).

However in some analyses, straight mean fluorescence indices (MFI) minus IVTT background were used.

Transduction efficiencies, mean fluorescence intensities (MF), and mean fluorescence Indices (MFI) were compared between test conditions using a paired, two-tailed Student's t-test.

NKDCs and DCs from V α14 TCR Tg mice expressed more MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules, as expected (percentages and mean fluorescence indices, MFI).

In close agreement with total protein levels, 5FU treatment leads to higher cell surface levels of DR4 than does Nut3 treatment, with mean fluorescence indices (MFIs) of 1.34±0.04 and 1.04±0.03, respectively.

It was found that SM3 bound minimally to PMNs (Fig.  6a) via flow cytometry, with the mean fluorescence intensity index significantly lower compared to ZR-75-1 cells (Fig.  6b).