Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
During a time period that does not include the perturbation due to a large earthquake (for example, the 2008 2010 mean field minus the 2005 2007 mean field), the mean field difference is within ±2 μGal a measure of GRACE data noise and inherent gravity variations in this region.
Similar(59)
The mean square vector field difference per degree between the final IGRF-2005 (the arithmetic mean of A1, B3 and C1) and DGRF-2005 ishownwn as the black dashed line.
The evaluations include calculations of root mean square vector field differences between the candidates, comparisons of the power spectra, and degree correlations between the candidates and a mean model.
In Fig. 9 the power spectra of the mean square vector field differences per degree between the candidates and also SV-2007.5-G10 compared to SV-2007.5-G11 are presented.
This result is not unexpected, because the ECHAM5 model is the one that offers the lowest differences in the mean field (Figure 2).
In each case global comparisons of root mean square (RMS) vector field differences are made first, then comparisons in the spectral domain, per degree and then coefficient by coefficient; finally maps of differences between candidate models and a weighted mean model are presented.
The bottom row displays the mean of the RMS vector field differences between each candidate model and all other candidate models from (7) labelled 'Mean Diff'.
The final three rows of Table 2 involve the arithmetic means of the RMS vector field differences of i, j R of model i from the other models j.
The final row of Table 3 gives the arithmetic means of the RMS vector field differences of i,j R of model i from the other models j confirm that A, B, E, and F have the smallest (_{i}!,overline {R}).
Full fields of standard error of the mean and observed minus analyzed difference are provided with the climatological mean fields of conductivity at https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/woa13/.
Group 4 clusters also had strong field differences; they had low correlation in gene expression and differences in mean level of expression between fields in both seasons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com