Sentence examples for mean exposure values from inspiring English sources

For all variables, those subjects younger than 50 years old were consistently below mean exposure values.

Figure 1 shows the annual mean exposure values for radon and its progeny in WLM, and for external γ-radiation in mSv and LRN in kBqh m−3 for the exposed cohort members.

The annual very high mean exposure values for radon and its progeny in the early years decreased after 1955 due to the introduction of ventilation measures (see Figure 1).

In addition to an analysis where only cases with complete information were included, an analysis was carried out after multiple imputations (Rubin 1987) of cumulative and mean exposure values (missing on 65 of 574 individuals).

The annual mean exposure values for fine dust, silica dust and arsenic are given in Figure 2. Owing to the use of dry drilling, the concentrations of dust had been very high until 1955 and then decreased steadily with the implementation of wet drilling, reaching very low levels after 1970.

Mean total exposure values for edoxaban alone expressed as AUC0 inf ranged from mean (±SD) values of 1576.8 (±322.7) to 1965.5 (±420.9) ng·h/mL, consistent across study cohorts and with historical data [ 7, 21– 23].

Figure 1 shows the mean annual exposure values for silica dust in the cohort.

Figure 1 shows the mean annual exposure values for external Hp(10) dose and for liver dose from plutonium exposure.

This method assigns the ordered group means to exposure values instead of the naive group means.

Table 5 indicates the mean minimum and maximum exposure values estimated for the various examination types considered (with the exception of the upper leg examination where the dose to the prostate was considered to be negligible).

Using these predicted exposure values, the mean RSA for the ligand and non-ligands peptides was found to be 0.214+/− 0.048, and 0.205+/− 0.058, respectively.