Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
The measurement mean error was less than 1.5% in velocity range of 0 30 m/s.
The mean error was 9.6 mm in three-dimensional (3D) verification.
The method was less accurate for radiographs made before revision, for which the mean error was 0.6 mm (overestimate) ± 1.0 mm.
The overall mean error was less than 0.4 mm in the cortical region and 0.3 mm in the subchondral region of the bone.
On radiographs acquired 6 weeks after arthroplasty, the mean error was −0.1 mm (underestimate) ± 0.6 mm (standard deviation), with 72% of the measurements within 0.5 mm of the original minimum thickness and 87% within 1.0 mm.
The closer the mean error was to zero, the closer the root-mean-square standardized error was to 1, signified that the prediction values were close to measured values (Castrignano et al. 2007).
Similar(41)
The root mean squared error and residual mean error are 1.6 and −0.66 m respectively.
For this sensor, the mean error is 1.7%, and the maximum peak error is 11.9%.
If λ is higher, the atoms that satisfy the required mean error are fewer.
Once the model is calibrated, the tuned mean error is computed.
The results in Table 2 show that the mean error is negative in both samples.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com