Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(35)
The results for both algorithms are compared and the relative mean error in axial direction is 0.30% and 0.48%.
After updating, the mean error in natural frequencies is decreased from 3.23% to 2.34%, and the average MAC number is increased from 0.87 to 0.94.
The methods were validated using the physical phantom and we found that the mean error in the measurement was less than 0.5° in each of the three co-ordinate planes.
Short-range order is also well described by the new methodology, where the mean error in the predicted atomic coordinates in comparison with the atomistic simulations is in the order of 1 2 pm over all the compositions and temperatures considered.
The three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system had a mean error in the three-dimensional surfaces of 0.057 mm, a repeatability error (variance) of 0.0016 mm, a mean error of 0.6 mm in linear measurements compared with manual measurements, and a field of view of 170° horizontally and 102° vertically.
The heat transfer capacity (UA) measurement by means of a calibration heater (1.25 12.5 kW/m³) was found to be very precise (<1.5% standard deviation) and the online in situ determination of the viscosity fairly accurate (9.8% arithmetic mean error) in comparison to the offline measured viscosity.
Similar(25)
Mean errors in automatic volume estimation ranged from 0.07 to 0.6%, depending upon capillary diameter.
The mean errors in glaciers, deserts and wetlands were −1.05 m, −2.03 m and −2.43 m, and 1.05 m in built-up areas.
The results demonstrate clearly visible segmentations of bone surfaces with a localization accuracy of <0.6 mm and mean errors in estimating fracture displacements below 0.6 mm.
Fitting errors for each point were calculated as mean errors in α using an X-fit routine [32].
Calculation of rates see caption Fig. 2. Error bars were omitted for clarity; mean errors in α : mackinawite (200) ± 0.0620, greigite (440) ± 0.115, pyrite (200) ± 0.0285.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com