Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(2)
Mean efficiency per amplicon was used for relative expression estimates.
In performing the mean efficiency per amplicon calculation, the software was manually set to automatically exclude efficiency values deviating more than 5% from the median efficiency and samples which did not show amplification.
Similar(58)
We calculated efficiency (species per person hour) for each sampling method in each month, and mean efficiency for each sampling method as the mean of four months.
Table 2 Mean efficiency of spatial detections per frame for some methods Method Spatial attack Temporal attack Zhi-yu and Xiang [44] 50.49 – Hsu et al. [45] 98.34 – Lin et al. [46] 82.05 – Pan and Lyu [47] 100 – Subramanyam and Emmanuel [48] 85.01 99.5 Amerini et al. [49] 98.17 – Wang and Farid [50] – 100 Proposed Framework 97.86 96.53.
The mean efficiency (calculated as species per person hour) for soil samples was 1.0, pitfall traps was 0.2, litter samples was 2.6, active search quadrats was 2.6 and tree beats was 1.4 species per person hour respectively.
The top one third of districts in the country has a mean efficiency score of 90percentnt or more, while the bottom 10 per cent of districts exhibit mean inefficiency score of as high as over 75percentnt or more.
Mean efficiency was then calculated.
Amplification efficiencies ranged from 76% to 101% with a mean efficiency of 88% (Table 1).
Mean labeling efficiency per treatment was calculated to ensure no overall bias.
Perhaps you meant "per day" instead of "per week"?
This could mean greater efficiency and lower costs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com