An analysis of variance using recombination estimates as dependent variable and MAFs as a mean effect shows significant differences between categories for all populations, with bins with high MAFs showing high recombination estimates (F9, 636,901 = 776,8 p = <0.0001; Figure S2).
As values return to normal, the assets underperform.The reversion-to-the-mean effect shows up most over longer periods.
As the adjusted means for the main effects show, physical HRQL is lower in the presence of obesity, depressed mood, or diabetes, respectively (the pattern underlying the significant three-way interaction will be described in the next paragraph).
The mean treatment effect showed substantial increase in volume productivity for the control compared with the residue-removed treatment of 19 m3 ha− 1 and 28 m3 ha− 1 in the F1R and F2R respectively (Table 3b).
Rotigotine versus placebo QTc differences in time-matched changes from baseline showed mean effects close to zero (upper confidence limits were below +5 ms and lower confidence limits were above −5 ms).
More recently, theoretical work by Orr has shown that mean effects on fitness of the substituted mutations are similar to a geometric distribution, with each new mutation substituted in the population having a proportionally smaller effect on fitness than the previous mutation [22], [34], [35].
Their frequency distribution and mean effects on peak pressure are shown in Table 1.
Figure 2 shows the mean effects plot for the crude biodiesel yield of in situ transesterification via alkaline catalysis.
Figure 3 shows the mean effects plot for the crude biodiesel yield from in situ transesterification via acidic catalysis.
The only exception was mental health measures, where both the treated and control groups showed positive mean effects, which were statistically and clinically significant.
