Spatial patterns and the zonal mean distribution of the E2E P99 were very similar to those of E2E mean.
Monthly monitoring over a year determined the mean distribution patterns, their changes and whether these overlapped.
Within 3 mm deviation either way, the absolute mean distribution of deviation between the contour of the deformed model and the original mandible was 92.5%.
The effect of particle size (mean, distribution) on the mixing torque/force was small and the use of a pre-conditioning step also had minimal impact.
There were no statistically significant changes in the first-order blood methanol half-life or clearance during pregnancy, but the mean distribution volume per kilogram body weight decreased by 22% and 17% in the 600 and 1800 ppm groups.
From the cumulative intruded volume versus pressure data obtained from MIP experimentation, the experimental pore size distribution parameters such as mean distribution radius (r0.5), dispersion coefficient (d) and permeable porosity (P) are calculated.
Furthermore, it is shown that resolving the inner structure of the instantaneous flamelet is a necessity for predicting the mean distribution of certain species, specifically radicals, in the turbulent flame.
Figure 1b shows the historical mean distribution of surface fresh water flux (P + R−E) in salinity coordinates for the ten CMIP5 models and for two re-analysis/satellite based air-sea flux datasets (CORE2-Dai and OAGP-Dai; see Methods).
Water cycle amplification rate is defined as the water cycle amplitude change (inferred from equation (1) for the observational estimates) divided by the climatological mean water cycle amplitude (i.e. from long-term mean distribution of P−E+R in observations and historical CMIP5 simulations).
A climatological mean distribution for the surface water pCO2 over the global oceans in non-El Niño conditions are presented with spatial resolution of 4° (latitude) x 5° (longitude) for a reference year 2000 based upon about 3 million measurements of surface water pCO2 obtained from 1970 to 2007 (Takahashi et al., 2009).
The mean distribution width is used to rate the fitting results.
