Sentence examples for mean difference scores from inspiring English sources

The comparisons of mean difference scores illustrated in the Bland-Altman plots show considerable consistency across the different modalities of questionnaire administration for both the EQ-5D-3L™ Vandand the descriptive system.

Mean difference scores for each condition are shown in Fig. 3b.

Comparison of mean difference scores revealed no significant differences between modes for any of the questionnaire items or scores.

To facilitate visualization of these results over time, we have plotted the mean difference scores (incongruent – congruent) in Figure 5B.

Variability among mean difference scores was assessed in several ways.

Mean difference scores of 4.13, 3.50, and 3.63 were found for the GI, sexual, and GU domains respectively.

The VLPFC and control groups did not differ in reinforcer devaluation performance measured by the mean difference score across the two sets of devaluation tests, Mann Whitney U=7.5, P=0.59 (Fig. 7).

The mean difference score within the Genesis 12 19 Study twin/sibling pairs at each wave ranged from 4.06 5.13 (SD, 3.99 4.80).

Effect-size analyses were performed using Cohen's d, which represents the mean difference score between two groups.

To examine the statistical magnitude of the observed differences, each mean difference score was standardized by relating this score to its standard deviation (effect size).

However, the weighted mean difference score for the MMSE in CS versus active controls was non-significant (1.45, 95% CI −0.11 to 3.02, p=0.07).