Sentence examples for mean detection thresholds from inspiring English sources

Mean detection thresholds for warmth and cool stimuli were also altered at both the lower and upper limbs during hypnosis, but these modifications were correlated neither with susceptibility nor with the changes in heat pain threshold.

Mean detection thresholds were calculated as the mean of the percent normal cells (> 50%) at which the sensitivity of detection first drops to zero.

Relative to the healthy control group, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in mean detection thresholds at 0.5 kHz for both patient groups (adjusted differences in means from controls: Temporal lobe variant FTLD group = 7.2 dB, Alzheimer's disease group = 4.7 dB); these threshold elevations were small and unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Tukey post-hoc analysis, with alpha level set at 0.01, revealed that mean detection threshold for vertically-oriented symmetry (M = 58.85, SD = 10.66) was lower compared to both oblique (M = 85.48, SD = 14.53) and horizontal (M = 72.76, SD = 14.55) conditions.

The mean detection threshold is the mean of the percent normal cells (> 50%) at which the sensitivity of detection first drops to zero.

triPOD's mean detection threshold of 96% greatly exceeded all other programs, followed by PSCN (82%) and BAFsegmentation (81%) (Table  3).

In the present study, a significant increase in the mean detection threshold for sucrose was observed in diabetics compared to normoglycemics.

Stimulus calibration for the test was performed by the "real-ear" method, based on mean detection threshold of 30 dB nHL (normal hearing level) clicks for 30 adults (18~25 years of age) with otologically normal hearing.

On screening assessment of peripheral hearing, increasing age was associated (as anticipated) with a significant increase in mean detection threshold at the three highest frequencies tested (2, 3 and 4 kHz).

Threshold was defined as the signal strength eliciting 75% correct responses.Figure 2 shows the mean symmetry detection thresholds as a function of axis of orientation for autistic (black bars) and non-autistic (gray bars) groups.

A main group effect was also evident (F 1, 27) = 4.42, p<0.05; η2partial =  0.14), with mean symmetry detection thresholds significantly lower in the autistic group compared to the non-autistic group when averaged across axis of orientation.