Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Four experimental models were constructed and tested outdoors to determine their mean daily efficiency and thermal losses during the night.
We calculated the mean daily efficiency and the thermal loss coefficient during night of each system combination.
The design, construction and experimental results from four ICS systems regarding water temperature profile, mean daily efficiency and thermal losses during night are presented and discussed.
Four experimental models of different designs were constructed and tested to determine their performance regarding their mean daily efficiency and thermal losses during the night.
Regarding reflector types, the ICS models with CPC reflectors achieve higher mean daily efficiency, while models with involute reflectors present high efficiency only in low operating temperatures.
Test results showed that the ICS systems with asymmetric CPC reflectors present almost the same mean daily efficiency and better preservation of hot water temperature during the night, compared to the ICS system with the symmetric CPC reflectors.
Similar(53)
According to the experimental results, mean daily collector efficiency is about 40%.
There were no other differences in the mean daily feed intakes, nor in the feed efficiency.
When mean daily temperature increased by 1.2 °C, water use efficiency (WUE) decreased by 7.3%, the summed length of the growing period of the rotation was shortened by 23 days, and the total yield of the rotation decreased by 7.8%.
During the outdoor testing, the mean daily electrical, thermal and overall energetic and exergetic efficiencies of the PV/LHP module were measured at 9.13%, 39.25%, 48.37% and 15.02% respectively.
Estimates of 8-day mean daily gross primary production (GPP) at the 1 km spatial resolution are now operationally produced by the MODIS Land Science Team for the global terrestrial surface using a production efficiency approach.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com