Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Monthly mean daily diffuse solar irradiance on a horizontal surface (kW/m2).
Estimation of monthly mean daily diffuse irradiance on horizontal surface HD [22] H D = 0.337 - 0.068 H G H 0 + 0.025 H G H 0 2 - 0.002 H G H 0 3 × H G. (7) V.
Similar(58)
Monthly average daily diffuse irradiation on horizontal surface.
For the daily based prediction, the diffuse fraction model with linear form is the most suitable one with root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) of 1.3081 MJ/m2 and 0.8767, while for the monthly mean daily prediction, the diffuse coefficient model again with linear form provides the utmost accuracy, for which RMSE and R are 0.5391 MJ/m2 and 0.9258, respectively.
During the past 60 years in order to estimate horizontal diffuse solar radiation on both daily and monthly mean daily basis, numerous empirical models have been developed or established for many locations around the world.
In the present study, we have proposed a methodology for estimating the hourly, monthly mean daily, and annual direct normal irradiance DNI in the presence or the absence of measured global and diffuse horizontal irradiances.
In this present study, a proposed methodology for estimating the hourly, monthly mean daily, monthly and annual direct normal irradiance DNI in the presence or absence of measured global and diffuse horizontal irradiances.
In this study, a simplified methodology for estimation of the hourly, monthly mean daily, and annual direct normal irradiance DNI data in the presence or absence of measured global and diffuse horizontal irradiances (GHI, DHI) is carried out first.
Then in a case study, by utilizing the long term global and diffuse solar data, in overall 26 new models have been established for both daily and monthly mean daily predictions for the city of Kerman, Iran.
Mean daily germination (MDG).
Mean daily germination (MDG) .
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com