Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
The mean correlation was 0.56, indicating that there was no multicollinearity, which could have compromised the regression results.
Within our time resolution, the mean correlation was the highest at zero lag time.
For the shuffled data, the overall mean correlation was 0.01 ± 0.01.
Mean correlation was calculated at each cortical point for all pairings of each subject versus the mean time-series of the other 9 subjects.
The mean correlation was 0.43, so that fluctuations in alpha power only predicted ∼20% (r = 0.19) of the variance in relative gait speed.
In these electrodes, the mean correlation was r = 0.433, P < 0.01 (see Fig. 2E for an example from a single electrode).
Similar(46)
Using weighted mean correlation is recommended especially for cases when the individual correlations are not high.
The majority of the studies (45%) were conducted in Hong Kong, followed by US (18%) and Canada (14%). Figure 2 shows that the overrall mean correlation is moderate, r = .46, 95% CI [.42,.49] and significant, z (27) = 24.50, p < .01.01
The estimated true mean correlation is computed as an average of observed correlations, as previously mentioned.
The variants with the highest mean correlation were QMEANfamily (082) with a mean correlation of 0.778 and MULTICOM-REFINE (013) with a mean correlation of 0.768.
Consequently, we performed a one side unpaired t-test to evaluate whether the mean correlation is larger in the first case.
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com