Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
For younger subjects, mean compression force in Hands-Only CPR (458 ± 29 N) was significantly lower than in 30:2 CPR (488 ± 29 N).
The dependent variable for the LED test has traditionally been the average of the three hold phases with the highest mean compression force (LEDF).
The outcome variables, mean compression force (LEDF) and a measure of force variability defined by the root-mean square (RMS) of the force signal during the steady-state hold (LEDRMS), were processed using custom Matlab software (v2013b, MathWorks, Natick, MA) and were considered dependent variables for analysis.
For older subjects, mean compression force in Hands-Only CPR (374 ± 33 N) was significantly lower than in 30:2 CPR (458 ± 29 N) and in 30:2 CPR younger subjects (488 ± 29 N) delivered significantly more forceful compressions than did older subjects (458 ± 29 N).
There was no difference in mean compression force for RP compared to FP (both 12.8 daN ±1.3, p = 0.934).
Analysis showed that the mean compression force applied was 10 dN and 13 dN for the blurred and adequate films, respectively, which is a significant difference (P < 0.01).
Similar(52)
A multivariate general linear model with post hoc comparisons was used to compare the outcomes of mechanical testing, mean compressive force and mean area of compression of the three groups (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 21, IBM Corp .. Two-tailed paired t-test was also performed to evaluate the difference between compressive force and area across the osteotomy initially and after 10 min.
Mean compressive force and area of compression before and after loading were evaluated similarly.
SMA staples used in this study are distinguishable from plate implants via their markedly higher mean compressive forces and area of compression across the osteotomy.
Measures: compression force, b MGD (mean glandular dose).
Seventy-one percent of loading activities exceeded the safe loading level of 3.4 kN compression force at L5/S1 (mean: 3.9 kN, min max: 2.1 7.0 kN).
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com