Sentence examples for mean coexpression level from inspiring English sources

Although mean coexpression level in control clusters was about 17% greater than in random groups of genes (0.196 ± 0.04, P = 7.4e-07), it was also more than three times lower than that found in cis-eQTL clusters.

For cis-eQTL genes within "250 kb" clusters, coexpression level was 0.755 ± 0.07 (mean ± SD), this value being significantly greater (P < 10e-16) that that obtained for detected genes in control clusters (0.23 ± 0.09).

All the data suggested that the expression level of core protein determined the Core-Fluc coexpression level in vitro and in vivo.

The determination of mean coexpression coefficients r P of interactions that have been logarithmically grouped according to their C vw allows us to find a statistically significant trend toward elevated levels of coexpression of conserved yeast interactions that are placed in highly clustered neighborhood (inset, Fig. 3c).

For the ES and EB expression data, the mean coexpression index was 0.027 and 0.021 respectively.

This process was repeated for 10,000 times; the resulting distributions of both coexpression index and mean coexpression index were fit to the Gaussian density function.

The P values of the coexpression index and mean coexpression index from the real data were determined according to the derived probability distribution by the simulation.

We next determined the P value of both the coexpression index and mean coexpression index at the window size of 20 genes by Monte-Carlo simulation.

The results presented above suggest that at least part of the high coexpression level of neighboring yeast gene pairs is due to natural selection on coexpression.

The cutoff point represented a coexpression level, at which F d and F n were extremely deviated.

The coexpression level decreases with these tandem genes excluded, but still remain significant.