Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Geometric mean for turbidity was highest at site 2, possibly due to erosion and compaction of the soil surface by cattle (Table 2), and lowest geometric mean canopy cover % directly above site 2 (Table 4).
However, there is no significant relationship between the number of nests and the mean canopy cover over the nests of the colony (Spearman: ρ = 122, n = 10, P = 0.48).
Similar(58)
After including correction factors which accounted for the mean canopy covers of existing forest types, the method allowed the computation of NPP estimates for all Italian forests.
In the model, each shrub was assigned a size class with an average canopy cover.
Similarly, log10 + 1 transformed WNV-positive corvid death ratios were best predicted by a model including the average distance to the nearest CSO stream, mean tree canopy cover, proportion of houses built in the 1950s 1960s, and median household income (Table 3) (R = 0.31; p < 0.001; ω i = 91.3%).
Mean percent canopy cover at used nest sites was 56.6 % (SE = 3.4) and 64.1 % (SE = 3.2) at random sites with a range from 0.0 to 97.8 %.
Mean juniper canopy cover across the 97 sites was 12%% (range 0 74%%).
Presence of cattle near sites 1 and 2 (Fig. 2), lowest geometric mean riparian canopy cover % along the cattle ditch section (Fig. 2) (Table 4), and irrigation water transport through site 2 to site 1 led to higher geometric mean of Enterococci in-stream water concentrations at site 1 than site 5 (Table 1).
Stand basal area, mean canopy height, and canopy cover index all declined with increase in elevation.
LiDAR metrics extracted for the analysis included the 30th, 70th and 95th height percentiles, mean height and canopy cover (percentage of returns from above a cut-off of 0.5 m to remove the understorey) as these are widely used for development of volume equations.
LiDAR systems with large footprints (> 5 m) produce estimates of mean tree height, canopy cover, or canopy density for an area.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com