Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
When this poorly performing sample was removed, the mean call rate was 99.6% (Table 2).
Mean call rate per individual was 0.983; 2 of 329 individuals were removed for low genotyping (call rate<0.1).
The mean call rate, which is 1 minus the rate of missing data, exceeded 98% at the SNP level and ranged from 73.4% to 93.5% at the sample level for four of the five plates analyzed.
We have recently observed high concordance rates (99.9999%) between blood and saliva replicate pairs on the next generation Illumina canine array with 170,403 QC-filtered SNPs, with a mean call rate for saliva samples of 99.78% (n = 3, data not shown).
Mean call rate was 95.7%.
The mean call rate was 99.09%.
Similar(37)
Mean call rates in the other 98 dogs were 92% for SNPs flanking htr1A, 94% for htr1B, 93% for htr2A, and 93% for slc6A4.
The mean base call rate for the project was 99%.
With a mean calling rate of 102.2 calls/min males took up enough energy for a further 29,400 calls.
Subsequently, mean E P ratios, mean calling rate and mean call parameter values were calculated across all five females for a given day, with E P ratios being shifted backwards for 2 days to account for the time lag between hormone presence in blood and hormone excretion in faeces (see above).
Mean call-rate per horse after quality control was 99.6%%, and ranged from 91.3 to 99.97 %.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com