Exact(6)
Mean bone width loss mid-root (S.D).
Mean bone width loss alveolar crest (S.D).
The mean bone width change at the graft site was greater in the test group than in the control group (3.94 ± 1.62 mm vs. 3.01 ± 0.89 mm).
Table 3 Summary of mean bone loss at the apex, mid-root, and alveolar crest in low-, andrage-, and high-angle patients Mean bone width loss at apex (S.D).
The mean bone width for IC anterior alveolar bone was 5.80 mm for dentulous maxilla and 4.06 mm for edentulous maxilla at (e1), 5.61 mm for dentulous maxilla and 5.08 mm for edentulous maxilla at (e2), and 8.45 mm for dentulous maxilla and 8.42 mm for edentulous maxilla at (e3).
The mean bone width of the IC anterior alveolar bone was 4.05 mm in edentulous maxilla at e1. Considering the placement of an implant with a diameter of 4 mm, which is now commonly used, there are still comparatively many cases with high risk.
Similar(54)
The software calculated BMC (g), BMD (g/cm2), average bone width (cm) and average bone area (cm2).
The average bone height gained was 3.3 ± 0.2 mm and the average bone width 3.9 ± 0.2 mm.
The mean labial bone width for the MLIA ranged between 0.0 and 1.61 mm and 0.1 and 1.81 mm for the control group.
Six months after the regenerative intervention using the CCXBB blocks, the mean increase in bone width was 4.12 mm and hence, this outcome allowed for the placement of dental implants in 11 out of 15 patients (73.3%).
The test group showed a mean bone loss of 0.77 mm ± 0.42 SD/0.57 mm ± 0.44 SD (defect depth/defect width) on the mesial side and 0.82 mm ± 0.42 SD/0.62 mm ± 0.36 SD (defect depth/defect width) on the distal side.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com