In the Bland Altman plot, the mean bias indicated that there was no systematic error [22].
Exceptions are the female and the non-Western European subsample.20 Considering the mean of standardised bias indicates that matching quality is lowest for the female subsample and immigrants from Western European countries with means of standardised bias of 9 and 12 %, respectively, after matching.
A positive bias indicates overestimation of GFR and a negative bias indicates underestimation.
The Bland Altman plot, performed to evaluate the accuracy of the absolute values of total WOB calculation, revealed a mean bias of 0.27 J/L, indicating an underestimation of the ({text{WOB}}_{{{text{tot}}_{text{real}} }}), with a limit of agreement of 0.6 to −0.11 J/L (Fig. 5).
Dotted lines indicate the mean bias and the 95%% limits of agreement.
The mean bias of the refractometer (0.6%) indicated that the refractometer underestimated the milk total solids by 0.6%, on average.
It should be noted that the refractometer underestimated the colostral IgG concentration by approximately 10 g/L as indicated by the mean bias for the refractometer being 9.9 g/L.
Calculation of the mean bias deviation between the predicted and experimental data indicates agreement better than 0.45 °C for the dry bulb temperature and 1.1 °C for the mean radiant temperature.
As described previously (Marshall et al. 2008), model measurement comparisons for NO at monitoring station locations indicate reasonable to good agreement (mean bias, absolute bias, and error, 29%, 42%, and 1.6 μg/m, respectively; model measurement correlation, 0.7).
The model was more accurate and less biased in predicting the MBCD than risperidone as indicated by its lower mean accuracy and mean bias values.
