Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This may be interpreted as the stroke volume (SV) to mean average pressure, see [12].
The absolute values of average mean pressure coefficients on side face-B and face-D reduce as the side ratio of the models increases due to the reattachments of flow.
The device stores data on average mean pressure (cm H2O), average mean power per breath (watt), average peak flow per breath (L/s) and total work of breathing during one session of 30 breaths (joules).
Similar(57)
The last equation of system Eq. 5 is found by first equating MAP to the time-weighted average of the mean pressures of part II (M2) and parts I and III′ + III (M1 and M3, respectively) taking into account the duration of parts I (T1), II (T2), and III′ + III (T3) (see Eq. 6 and Fig. 2).
Mean pressure was defined as the average of all activated sensors in a mask for a single step.
The averaged differences between measurement and predicted results are 14.49% (mean pressure coefficient) and 13.74% (fluctuating pressure coefficient).
Overall, the typical VETSA participant's blood pressure was in the pre-hypertension range (JNC 2004); average blood pressure (mean of four readings across the day) was 133.6 mmHg systolic and 83 mmHg diastolic.
Furthermore, the relationships among time averaged pressure drop, time averaged mean velocity and time averaged friction factor are investigated and the critical limit of ω′= 8.61 is found.
The two-phase flow obtained for different channel depths and different contact angles was characterized by means of the average pressure drop, its standard deviation and the main frequency of the fluctuations.
According to Guyton's model, venous return depends on the pressure gradient between the average vascular pressure (called the mean systemic filling pressure) and the right atrium.
Tolerance estimates based on the used/available pressure gradient and the average general pressure value had the highest mean correlations with the expert judgment classification (mean r = 0.4) and with the other approaches (mean r of 0.48 and 0.46, respectively).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com