Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Mean applicability score was 4.9 (range: 2 8).
Mean applicability score differences were 16.2 (p=0.01) and 14.9 (p<0.04), respectively.
With respect to country, the highest mean applicability score was for guidelines developed in the UK.
The differences in mean applicability score for 2010 and 2012, were 26.5 (p<0.03) and 28.3 (p<0.02), respectively.
Similar(56)
The mean applicability rate of Fibrotest was 99.03%.
The lowest applicability score was found for section 3 (replacing sitting at work by standing).
The applicability score was high considering the time spent on PA discussions at baseline.
Applicability mean score differed by year of guideline publication.
Satisfaction with the intervention and applicability scores was analyzed by calculating the mean scores, 95% confidence intervals, and SDs for the pooled data from the satisfaction questionnaire.
This study found that, among 137 guidelines published from 2008 to 2013 described in systematic reviews published from 2010 to 2014, the mean and median domain scores for applicability were 43.6% and 42.0%, respectively, and applicability scored lower than the other five Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) domains.
Applicability scored 6% in the Netherlands and 8% in Germany.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com