Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
The mean angular deviation from polar axis was −13.8°.
An index of Kikuchi patterns with a mean angular deviation of < 1° was accepted as orientation data.
Specimens with mean angular deviation beyond 15° or showing mismatches between inclination and declination were excluded for determining the polarity pattern.
Mean shoulder deviation was 1.41 mm (SD 0.55); mean apical deviation, 1.20 mm (SD 0.54); and mean angular deviation, 5.27° (SD 2.51).
Mean shoulder deviation was 1.41 mm (SD 0.55), mean apical deviation was 1.20 mm (SD 0.54) and mean angular deviation was 5.27° (SD 2.51).
Schneider et al. [4] report in their systematic review a mean deviation of 1.07 mm (95% CI 0.76 1.22 mm) at the shoulder and 1.63 mm (95% CI 1.26 2 mm) at the apex as well as a mean angular deviation of 5.26° (95% CI 3.94 6.58°).
Similar(48)
More than 85% of the tracks exhibited a southerly component, with track directions exhibiting a circular mean ± angular deviation of 189° ± 56° and a vector-length of r = 0.53.
For simulated and actual work the FOG system accurately reported lumbar postural characteristics for each activity (mean position, mean angular velocity, standard deviation).
We therefore examined circular statistics of SW tracks (those with track directions between 215° ± 45°), specifically their circular mean, vector length r and (assuming normally distributed data) equivalent angular deviation (Batschelet 1981).
Figure 6 Root-mean-square error (RMSE) of angle estimation in degrees versus angular deviation with SNR = 10 dB for ( θ 1,2 = 75°, 45°), ( ϕ 2 = 55°) and ( ϕ 1 = ϕ 2 + δ ).
maximum angular deviation.
More suggestions(14)
mean angular velocity
mean Standard deviation
mean angular deflection
mean standard deviation
mean angular distribution
mean absolute deviation
mean angular displacement
mean angular separation
mean angular speed
mean square deviation
mean ±standard deviation
mean angular stress
mean signed deviation
mean amplitude deviation
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com