Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
The mean angle of the piriform likewise decreased from 65.1° to 55.7° (P =.019).
The mean angle of the maxilla relative to sella-nasion decreased from 69° to 56.8° with age (P =.015).
The mean angle of the initial vector was anterior (57.2[deg ] [plusmn] 41.8) in the normal group, left anterior in the PRBBB group (34.4[deg ] [plusmn] 39.5) and in the RVHtcd group (31.9[deg ] [plusmn] 41.0) and.
The mean angle of the terminal vector was right anterior (158.3[deg ] [plusmn] 36.8) in the PRBBB group, rightward (179.7[deg ] [plusmn] 29.9) in the RVHtcd group and right posterior (212.6[deg ] [plusmn] 37.8) in the normal group.
where is the mean angle of the clusters in frame defined by (13). is a value between 0 and 1 inclusive.
The relative angle deviations were calculated in reference to the mean angle of the complete image.
Similar(46)
The inversion method was applied to real partial angle stack seismic data, and the sampling interval of the seismic data is 2 ms. Figure 6 displays the used three partial angle stack seismic sections, and the mean angles of the seismic data in Fig. 6a c are 8°, 16°, and 24°, respectively.
In each iteration, the difference between the mean angles of the randomized data sets was obtained and compared to the difference in mean angles of the original data sets.
Differences in birth peaks were considered significant if the difference in mean angles of the two original data sets was larger than the difference in mean angles in randomized data from more than 95% of 10,000 iterations.
The mean angles of the preferred phases of LTS bursts were not significantly different between neuron groups (BZ, 279.5 ± 5.1°; CZ, 282.3 ± 6.4°; Fig. 5 G) and were not different to those for all spikes (Fig. 5 E).
The mean angles of the preferred phases (i.e. the circular means) were not significantly different between neuron groups (BZ neurons, 283.4 ± 3.8°; CZ neurons, 291.1 ± 6.7°; Watson Williams F-test), but the distributions of the preferred phases of individual neurons differed (P < 0.01, Mardia-Watson-Wheeler test; Fig. 5 E).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com