Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
There is no systematic difference in the mean amplitude between transverse and radial excitations.
The overall CNV (oCNV) was calculated as the mean amplitude between S1 and S2.
Separate analyses of variance were performed on the percentage of correct responses (without the factor ROI), on mean ERP amplitude between 250 and 400 ms, and on early (mean amplitude between 60 and 140 ms) and late (mean amplitude between 200 and 400 ms) GBR.
The mean amplitude between the onset and offset of activity, when the EMG fell rose and below this level, was calculated.
Anterior and central components were measured as follows: N2 mean amplitude between 200 and 250 ms at the FFC1h, FFC2h, FFC3h, FFC4h electrode sites.
The MMN was then computed from the difference curve (deviant standard) as the mean amplitude between 100 and 250 ms [ 10].
Similar(53)
Group effects indicated differences in mean amplitudes between the optimistic and pessimistic groups while group-intensity interactions indicated differences in the ASF slopes between optimistic and pessimistic subjects.
Hence, in the anti-saccade task, the mean amplitudes between the 61st and the 90th sampling time were calculated, while the mean value between the 81st and 110th sampling time were calculated for inhibition of return.
PG compared to OG presented larger ERP mean amplitude differences between high-risk and low-risk task conditions at parietal electrode positions (Pz, P4) around 400 ms.
Post hoc two-tailed paired t-tests of task effects within group showed that there was a graded increase in mean root mean square amplitude between rest and post, and between post and move, respectively, across all groups in the case of gastrocnemius muscle, and post and move were similarly greater than rest for the tibialis anterior muscle (P < 0.05, with Bonferroni correction).
PINV was the mean amplitude of CNV between 500 and 2,000 ms following S2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com