Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
Mean accuracy was converted to a common metric, pi [Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1989).
Collapsed across all trials, mean accuracy was very high (M = 0.97, Range = 0.93 greater than 0.99).
The relative standard deviation of duplicate measurements was 11.4 % and the mean accuracy was ± 4.3%%.
Higher mean accuracy was observed in the CBC condition (89.7%), followed by the CBW (84.3%) condition, and lowest in the RCW condition (78.7%); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance ( P =.062).
We found that the most accurate movement achieved by F22 was mesiodistal tipping, whose mean accuracy was 82.5% (SD = 77.4) overall, and 96.7% at the lower premolars (SD = 96.9), closely followed by the upper molars (93.4%, SD = 72.6) and lower incisors (87.7%, SD = 85.9%).
The mean accuracy was, however, significantly higher for generalization involving multiple years (F2).
Similar(37)
Data from participants who scored 2.5 standard deviations above or below the mean accuracy were discarded.
The mean accuracy is calculated for 1-cm bins and plotted in black.
In the first-order Markov chain, the parameter values are ρ = 1, r = 1, and k = 0, and the mean accuracy is 33%.
A clear improvement is achieved when increasing T from 1 to 2. The highest mean accuracy is ~80.7%, achieved when T=2.
For the retrieval session, collapsing across item type (i.e. studied and unstudied items), the data related to mean accuracy were analysed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com