Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Participants' DTT performance generalized to the other two tasks (mean accuracy of 94%) and to teaching the tasks to a child with autism (mean accuracy of 91%).
For all participants, mean accuracy of target stimuli was above 94%, showing that participants were paying attention to the cross changes.
We observed a mean accuracy level of 75.55% (SD = 8.79) in the control group and mean accuracy of 58.93% (SD = 12.53) in the patient group.
Based on the external validation set, mean accuracy of the models was > 75%, which supports the utility of chemical descriptor based QSAR models for the acute rat toxicity end point.
The mean accuracy of the stereoradiographic reconstruction was 1.2 mm.
A(~V) = Mean accuracy of task performance without using visualization.
With a mean accuracy of 80.9 % the proposed method performs better (p<0.1) than the baseline method with a mean accuracy of 76.4 %.
A mean accuracy of Dice coefficient obtained is 0.67 in total.
The hardest label is L2 with a mean accuracy of approximately 72%.
The mean accuracy of prediction for anticancer activities was 90% (LOO CV).
A horizontal dotted line marks the mean accuracy of a random decision.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com