Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(35)
For both the Harrison modified Risser-Ferguson method on AP views and posterior tangent method on lateral cervical views, the mean absolute differences of observers' measurements are small.
For an error analysis on data from both AP views, the mean absolute differences of observers' measurements were 1.1° to 1.8° for angles and 1.2 mm to 2.3 mm for distances.
Main Outcome Measures: Observer reliability is determined with ICCs, 95% CIs, and observer error analysis (mean absolute differences of observers' measurements) for angles and distances derived from Harrison's modified Risser-Ferguson line-drawing method on anteroposterior (AP) lumbar and AP cervical radiographic views.
Objective: To determine whether the newly derived interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs would overstate or understate the results from 2 previously published studies, which used better known ICCs that assume nested factors, and to determine mean absolute differences of observers' measurements for 3 previous studies.
Simulation of 20 reference cements in a modified Virtual Cement and Concrete Testing Laboratory produced compressive strength and heat of hydration results with mean absolute differences of 5.0%and6.5%5% compared to experimental data obtained from the same cements through the proficiency sample program of the Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory.
The weights are calculated using the mean absolute differences (MAD) distortion metric between the partially decoded WZ frames and the SI frames; see Section 4.3 for more details. 5.
Similar(25)
Relative risks estimated from inverse probability weighted models and multiply-imputed datasets differed by a mean absolute difference of 3%.
Results from completely unadjusted models were similar to results from adjusted models, with the estimated relative risks differing by a mean absolute difference of 6%.
In comparing the readings the nurse obtained from the two different tympanic thermometers, the mean absolute difference was 0.24 ± 0.22 °C.
The statistics from the validation using the first network shows a relative mean bias of about 1%, a relative mean absolute difference of 6%, and a mean absolute difference of 1.0 MJ m−2.
Overall model performance was assessed by comparing the root mean square (RMS) and mean absolute difference (MAD) between the model estimates and the reference standard bone ages.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com