Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Meals were matched for energy and macronutrient composition.
The test-meal was either a high-protein meal (En% P/C/F 65/5/30) or a high-carbohydrate meal (En% P/C/F 6/64/30), both meals were matched for energy density (4 kJ/g) and daily energy requirements (30%).
The test meals were matched for carbohydrate and protein, while fat content was 14% higher in the chicken meal than in the pork and beef meals.
The meals were matched for protein and carbohydrate, but differed in fat; the fat content of the shrimp-containing meal was 21.3 g versus 1.6 g in the pork meal.
Similar(56)
Patients were matched to well controls by meal date.
Students were matched by gender, age, ethnicity, eligibility for free school meals and the socio-economic mix of their schools.
These were matched with a sample collected after the subject's evening meal.
These 4 categories were matched on energy density, fat content, and type of food (each category contained one sandwich, one snack, one cookie, and one meal item).
Both meals were comparable and matched for energy density: 4 kJ/g.
One limitation is that the two test meals were not equicaloric nor matched for osmolality or taste; however, they were equally palatable.
Meals were disgusting.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com