meager backing for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "meager backing for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where there is insufficient support or evidence for a particular claim, idea, or initiative. Example: "The proposal received meager backing for its implementation, leading to its eventual rejection."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

A second significant headwind is the meager snap-back in bank lending.

The New York Times

"Most of my classmates sent part of their meager wages back home to support their little brothers' and sisters' education.

The New York Times

This is a progression that offers meager evidence either for evolution or for intelligent design.

The New Yorker

The inning made up for the Mets' meager scoring output for Chen.

The New York Times - Sports

He also looked back on his life as an artist and described it witheringly: "Art has been for me, when I did not deceive myself, a meager compensation for what I desire".

The New York Times - Books

Meager fines for errant corporations haven't satisfied the public's lust for rolling heads.

The New York Times

Discouraged, people show up in meager numbers for demonstrations these days.

The New York Times

Such are my meager qualifications for offering up some advice to make your summer rentals happier.

The New York Times

But meager contracts for a few thousands of dollars each won't pay for more employees.

The New York Times

One result, Ms. Karrenbrock said, is that the meager food for refugees will be cut.

The New York Times

Japan's meager market for wind turbines has actually slowed since Fukushima.

MIT Technology Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "meager backing for" when you want to emphasize that the support for something is not only small in quantity but also poor in quality or influence. For example, "The proposal failed because it received "meager backing for" its key initiatives".

Common error

Avoid using "meager backing for" when the support, though limited, is still strategically important or influential. Choose a more neutral term like "limited support" if the focus isn't on criticizing the quality of backing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "meager backing for" functions as a descriptive phrase, specifically an adjective modifying "backing" and a preposition indicating the recipient of that backing. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase follows standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

News & Media

0%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "meager backing for" effectively communicates the inadequacy of support for a specific cause or initiative. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. While examples are currently limited, the phrase is well-suited for neutral to formal contexts, emphasizing the insufficiency of support in various domains, including news, science, and business. Alternative phrases like "limited support for" or "scant support for" can be used to convey similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

insufficient backing for

Directly states the inadequacy of the backing.

inadequate support for

Similar to insufficient backing, stressing the lack of adequacy.

limited support for

Focuses on the extent of support rather than its quality.

deficient support for

Highlights the absence of a required or expected level of support.

scant support for

Emphasizes the lack of sufficient support.

minimal support for

Highlights that the support is at the lowest possible level.

weak support for

Highlights the fragility or ineffectiveness of the support.

poor support for

Indicates a low quality or ineffective level of support.

tenuous support for

Suggests that the support is shaky and unreliable.

flimsy support for

Similar to tenuous, emphasizing the insubstantial nature of the support.

FAQs

How can I use "meager backing for" in a sentence?

You can use "meager backing for" to describe situations where there is very little support or insufficient resources for a particular idea, project, or initiative. For instance, "The new policy received "limited support for" from the committee, resulting in its eventual rejection."

What are some alternatives to "meager backing for"?

Alternatives include "limited support for", "scant support for", or "weak support for", depending on the nuance you want to convey. Each emphasizes a slightly different aspect of the lack of support.

Is "meager backing for" formal or informal?

"Meager backing for" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. The choice depends more on the surrounding language and the overall tone of your writing.

What's the difference between "meager backing for" and "limited support for"?

"Meager backing for" emphasizes that the support is not only small but also weak or ineffective. "Limited support for" simply indicates that the amount of support is not substantial, without necessarily implying that the support is weak.