Exact(3)
Conception and design: KL and MC; Acquisition of data: all authors; Analysis and interpretation of data: all authors; Manuscript drafting: MC and KL; Manuscript revising: all authors; final approval of this version: all authors.
MC Acquisition of patient's sample and study design.
MC: Acquisition and analysis of data, approval of the final version.
Similar(57)
SS carried out study concept and design, and study supervision, OG carried out drafting of the manuscript, MG carried out analysis and interpretation of data, MC carried out acquisition of data, MCD carried out acquisition of data, AT carried out critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that male circumcision (MC) significantly reduces acquisition of HIV-1 infection among men.
The results of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that male circumcision (MC) significantly reduces acquisition of heterosexually transmitted HIV-1 among men,[1] [3] confirming observational evidence [4], [5] and adding plausibility to previous immunohistochemistry studies of the foreskin.
MC participated in acquisition of epidemiological and clinical data.
Three randomized clinical trials demonstrated that male circumcision (MC) reduced HIV acquisition risk among heterosexual men by approximately 60% [ 16– 16].
Male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV acquisition among men, leading WHO/UNAIDS to recommend a goal to circumcise 80%% of men in high HIV prevalence countries.
Study concept and design: MC, MB, IJH; acquisition of data: MC, MB; analysis and interpretation of data: MC, IJH; drafting of the manuscript: MC, IJH; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: MC, MB, IJH; statistical analysis: MC, IJH; obtaining funding: MC, MB; administrative, technical, or material support: MB.
TB, TR, MN, NS, LB, HU, RB, and MC participated in acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com