Exact(3)
For the bulk conductivity, we may assume either of the equally plausible three scenarios: (1) The whole bulk layer is p-type or (2) p-type conductivity occurs in the bulk layer only below a certain depth from the surface and adjacent to the bottom buffer layer as suggested by Jones et al. and Ager et al. [20, 29].
Therefore, for any (1leq ileq n), passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume either (lim_{krightarrowinfty}y_{i}^{k}(lambda)=y_{i}^{0}(lambda)) with (|y_{i}^{0}(lambda -y_{j}^{0}(lambda -y_{ju^) for (ineq j) or (lim_{krightarrowinfty}^{{i}^{k}(lambda)=infty).
The discharge process occurring in cavities, depending upon gas pressure, may assume either a spark, glow or pseudo-glow character.
Similar(5)
end{aligned} We may assume that either: (i) (m_{k}geqvarepsilon_{0}) for some (varepsilon_{0} > 0) (by passing to a subsequence if necessary); (ii) (m_{k}rightarrow0).
We first consider the case where k ⩾ 2. By (4.8) and continuity, without loss of generality, we may assume that either (i): 0 < a < b, or (ii): a < 0 < b.
By passing to a subsequence, we may assume that either: (mathrm{a}) quad frac{rho_{k}}{lambda_{k}}rightarrowinfty quad text{or} quad ( mathrm{b}) quad frac{rho_{k}}{lambda_{k}}rightarrow cgeq0.
Without loss of generality, we may assume that is either semicompact or satisfies condition.
Generically, we may assume that either a E > b E or a E < b E. Let us assume the former so that the percept a is what is perceived.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com