Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
In this work an optimized geometry for a filtering hydrocyclone with maximum total efficiency was obtained by using the Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm.
The optimized device exhibits a maximum total efficiency of 13.1 and 5.4 lm/W at 1,000 cd/m2.
The resulting device exhibits a maximum total efficiency of 13.1 lm/W and an efficiency of 5.4 lm/W at 1,000 cd/m2.
The optimized device exhibits a maximum total efficiency of 41.5 lm W−1, the highest value among hybrid WOLEDs with n-type ILs.
The device exhibits a maximum total efficiency of 41.5 lm W−1, the highest among hybrid WOLEDs with n-type ILs.
The device exhibits a maximum total efficiency of 41.5 lm W−1 and a low turn-on voltage of 2.5 V (>1 cd m−2).
Similar(53)
The device exhibits maximum total efficiencies of 29.8 cd/A and 20.9 lm/W, which slightly decrease to 28.6 cd/A and 16.5 lm/W even at a high luminance of 5000 cd/m2.
Simulation results show that the maximum total area efficiency of 11.22% for large area modules could be achieved based on the small cell with efficiency of 11.4% and reflectors with reflectivity of 0.9.
The Response Surface Method (RSM) model predicted an optimum operating inflow rate and underflow ratio of 721 ml s−1 of inflow rate and 30%, respectively, for the low-pressure hydrocyclone at a maximum total separation efficiency.
Compared to that, at − 0.6 V, the maximum total coulombic efficiency of the MES system deceased 61% at − 0.8 V.
The maximum possible total efficiency always increases with increasing pressure for the full range shown.
More suggestions(15)
maximum total duration
maximum total income
maximum total dose
maximum total point
maximum total oil
maximum total cell
maximum photochemical efficiency
maximum total time
maximum current efficiency
maximum total score
maximum total number
maximum total concentration
maximum total dietary
maximum total weight
maximum total power
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com