Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(3)
The psoas muscle thus forms a fusiform muscular body with maximum thickness at the level of the sacroiliac joint.
where c represents the theoretical maximum thickness at the vent and m characterises the rate of decrease in tephra thickness.
The exponential method, which uses the equation T x) = ce−mx (where T is a function of root isopach area, c is the theoretical maximum thickness at the vent, and m is the rate of decrease in tephra thickness; Pyle 1989; Fierstein and Nathenson 1992), was adapted to compare estimation results using mass (Fig. 4).
Similar(57)
The size of the spleen was largest at the 7th and 8th intercostal spaces and the maximum thickness was measured at the 9th to 12th intercostal spaces.
The visible size of the liver was largest at the 8th to 11th intercostal spaces and the maximum thickness was measured at the 8th and 9th intercostal spaces.
The maximum thickness was fixed at 800 μm (global thickness) and the minimum thickness was modified from 250 to 500 μm.
The experimental findings demonstrate how the role of the interface is crucial and how micro-corrugation is extremely beneficial in increasing the threshold of the maximum thickness beyond that at which coating bulging and delamination occur.
The maximum thickness was measured at the 8th and 9th intercostal spaces.
Synovitis and bone destruction around the MTP joints of the sections were scored as follows: synovitis 0 = not obvious, 1 = synovitis < 0.2 mm at maximum thickness, 2 = synovitis > 0.2 mm at maximum thickness; bone destruction 0 = not obvious, 1 = obvious bone erosion, 2 = marked bone erosion associated with penetration of pannus into the marrow space.
The maximum thickness was 72 cm at location (d) ~300 m above the vent.
The topology optimization evolves a structure which transforms along the length of the blade, changing from a design with spar caps at the maximum thickness and a trailing edge mass, to a design with offset spar caps toward the tip.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com