Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Looking at Fig. 8 reveals that the minimum and maximum star models for these two groups show the different trends from the average star model.
Similar(59)
As seen in Table 6 mean choice values are equal (1.743) for both groups for the maximum star model and unlike the average star model maximum choice value in maximum star model shows a big difference (0.635) although the maximum difference stands for maximum integration value which is equal to 0.712.
The only exceptions are higher mean choice value (1.784) and equal maximum choice value (2.059) in maximum star model for river-high-cut in which compared to the same values for river-cities.
However according to Table 6 the values measured for the maximum and minimum star models are more dispersed while the minimum star model seems to be smaller than minimum star model for non-river-cities, maximum star model is the biggest among all (the measured values for all the properties are equal to 3) and forms the climax of the models.
Another trend is that river-high-cut contains higher values in almost all properties (the only exception is maximum choice value in minimum star models which is −3 for river-high-cut compared to −2.718 for non-river-high-cut).
In this part, we draw out star models for each individual group in three levels including minimum, maximum, and mean which together replicate the general specifications of that group and try to compare the related results.
To reveal differences between these two groups the star models of river-cities and non-river-cities in average, minimum, and maximum level are shown in Fig. 8.
Fig. 9 Star models at three different levels; upper- left (minimum); upper- right (mean) and lower (maximum).
Fig. 10 Star models at three different levels; upper- left (minimum); upper- right (mean) and lower (Maximum); River-cities (blue), river-cut cities (green), non-river cities (red), river-high-cut cities (brown) and non-river-high-cut cities (orange).
Fig. 8 Star models; (Blue) star models for river-cities at three different levels from minimum to mean and maximum.
Our results were interesting and unexpected: maximum star activity was observed with 20-30% DMSO at pH 8.0, which in the absence of DMSO inhibited TaqII star activity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com