Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
As seen in Table 6 mean choice values are equal (1.743) for both groups for the maximum star model and unlike the average star model maximum choice value in maximum star model shows a big difference (0.635) although the maximum difference stands for maximum integration value which is equal to 0.712.
The only exceptions are higher mean choice value (1.784) and equal maximum choice value (2.059) in maximum star model for river-high-cut in which compared to the same values for river-cities.
However according to Table 6 the values measured for the maximum and minimum star models are more dispersed while the minimum star model seems to be smaller than minimum star model for non-river-cities, maximum star model is the biggest among all (the measured values for all the properties are equal to 3) and forms the climax of the models.
Similar(57)
Looking at Fig. 8 reveals that the minimum and maximum star models for these two groups show the different trends from the average star model.
To make these four measures comparable to each other, standardization is conducted on each set of measures varying from −3 at the center, showing the minimum value for that measure, to +3 at the edge of star model, showing the maximum value for that measure.
Standardization is conducted on each set of measures varying from −3 at the center to +3 at the edge of star model, showing the minimum and maximum value for that measure respectively.
Fig. 6 Star model of 42 river-cities Fig. 7 Star model of 21 non- river-cities.
When the logistic functions or exponential functions are employed, the model is known as the LSTAR (logistic STAR) model or ESTAR (exponential STAR) model, respectively.
Muse, movie star, model... yogi?
Our results were interesting and unexpected: maximum star activity was observed with 20-30% DMSO at pH 8.0, which in the absence of DMSO inhibited TaqII star activity.
This type of Structured additive regression (STAR) model is also known as geo-additive model.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com