Particularly, the maximum slew rate improvement is 8%, the core area of the proposed design is 0.052×0.254 mm2, the maximum slew rate is 0.53 (V/ns), and the area overhead is only 31% for one single output buffer.
Firstly, we assumed in Section 3.4 that the satellite's pointing accuracy is (0.5~mumbox{rad}), with (0.1~mbox{mrad}/mbox{s}) maximum slew rate.
Dynamic MRI was performed on a T system (Avanto; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a maximum slew rate of T/m/s, maximum gradient strength of mT/m, and a torso phased-array coil.
A 3.0-T scanner (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with a Quasar Dual Gradient system with 80-mT/m maximum amplitude, 0.16-ms minimal rise time and 200-T/m/s maximum slew rate was used.
The MR component of the hybrid system consists of a 3.0 Tesla static magnetic field, a radiofrequency (RF) transmit body coil and a gradient coil system which provides a maximum amplitude of 45 mT/m and a maximum slew rate of 200 T/m/s.
The imaging acquisition was performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner (Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) equipped with a gradient system with a 30-mT/m maximum amplitude, 0.2-ms minimal rise time and 150-T/m/s maximum slew rate.
Imaging data were acquired on a single MR scanner, a 3 T MAGNETOM Tim Trio (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with maximum gradient slew rate, 200 mT/m per second, maximum gradient strength, 40 mT/m, using a 12 channel receive-only head coil.
The optimization resulted in a maximum flux slew rate of δΦsig/δt=5×106Φ0/s.
Subjective tests indicate that the viewer discomfort can be predicted best by using maximum and slew rate of 95 percentile scene disparities together.
A combination of maximum and slew rate of 95 percentile disparity statistics per scene, estimated with the proposed CGO algorithm, was shown to predict viewer discomfort, seen as eye strain, with higher accuracy.
Standard imaging gradients with a maximum strength of 40 mTm–1 and slew rate 150 Tm–1 s–1 were used.
