Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The maximum score with this system was 24.
The AWI ranged from 54% to 83% of the maximum score with a mean of 65% (s.d. = 7%).
Psychological and physical distress scores were standardised so they represented a percentage of the maximum score with higher scores representing greater distress.
For simplicity of presentation, we converted the raw scores to a percentage of the maximum score, with 100 as the best score.
In contrast, all subscales except the 'social contact and appearance' showed a ceiling effect (>20% at the maximum score), with a percentage of patients with the highest scores between 24.1% for the 'psychosocial' subscale and 62.7% for the "distance estimation" subscale (Table 5).> -wrap-foot> All values in italic type indicate floor effect or ceiling effect.
More precisely, to assess the p-value associated with an observed CNA unit of length L, we calculate the U scores for any consecutive L probes (probes do not need to reside within the same unit) across the genome, and compare the maximum score with the score of the observed CNA unit.
Similar(54)
There was a poor relationship between our consensus method and the causality assessment index, in part because of dependence on a positive re-challenge to attain maximum scores with the causality index.
The ceiling effect refers to the percentage of patients with maximum score within the questionnaire, indicating the best clinical outcome.
The shRNA-TLR3 group showed a significantly lower maximum score compared with the other two groups.
The questions are graded from 0 3, with a possible maximum score of 30 with higher scores representing worse QoL.
21 Each item is scored on a 0 4 scale (maximum score = 56) with scores lower than 45 indicating an individual with a high risk for falls.
Related(20)
maximum connection with
maximum point with
maximum performance with
highest score with
maximum value with
maximum consensus with
maximum punishment with
maximum concordance with
maximum fun with
maximum expressiveness with
maximum hand with
maximum length with
maximum effect with
maximum pass with
maximum unpleasantness with
maximum blitz with
maximum content with
maximum transformation with
maximum privacy with
maximum mayhem with
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com