Sentence examples for maximum response strength from inspiring English sources

Equivalently, Fig. 6F shows the mean percentage increase in maximum response strength for ILD functions that exhibited a significant increase in maximum response strength.

Figure 4A shows an example ILD function that exhibited a noise-induced increase in maximum response strength by 42.8% of the maximum response strength in the no-noise condition, while Fig. 4B shows an example ILD function that exhibited a noise-induced decrease in maximum response strength by 35.4% of the maximum response strength in the no-noise condition.

Maximum response strength at the preferred location: defined as the maximum of the ILD function.

With respect to response strength, almost equal numbers of ILD functions exhibited suppression in maximum response strength (30.3%) (Fig. 4F; 'Dec' and 'Dec/Sf'), as exhibited enhancement of maximum response strength (34.8%), (Fig. 4F; 'Inc' and 'Inc/Sf').

The magnitude of increase in maximum response strength appeared in general to be higher for non-monotonic than for monotonic functions, but there was not a large difference between these groups in terms of decrease in maximum response strength.

The noise-induced change in maximum response strength was considered significant if the maximum response in the presence of noise differed from that in the absence of noise by 20% of the maximum response strength in the latter condition.

++ The extract induced contractions of the same strength as the maximum response obtained with acetylcholine in at least one test concentration.

Note that by using the inverse function of these functions, it is possible to determine the ILD (i.e. x value) at which a particular response strength, for example 50% of the maximum response (i.e. y value), occurred.

Before averaging across sites, the response strength at each site was normalized to the maximum response, averaged across time, to either sound presented alone.

The ILD50 was defined as the ILD at which the strength of the responses was 50% of the maximum response.

The presence or absence of additional topographic representations did not seem to be correlated to overall response strength, since we observed activity patches in experiments with both high and lower maximum signal strength.