Finally, it should be mentioned that the maximum relative message staggering delay must be smaller than.
Motivated by the analytical difficulties in dealing with the conventional robustness index, e.g., maximum sensitivity, we introduce the relative delay margin as a good alternative, which gives much simpler robust analysis.
where a 0 represents no transmission and δmax denotes the maximum of the relative delays.
Maximum time delay and less pulse broadening can be obtained by optimizing the shape of the super-Gaussian shaped pulses; the maximum time delay and corresponding gain increase with a decrease of injected energy, and larger relative delay can be obtained by a smaller duration pulse.
It is further shown that a certain relative delay margin can represent the robustness level well and the contour can be sketched with a simpler procedure than the one using maximum sensitivity index.
Wang et al. [7] introduced the concept of relative delay.
Maximum relative strain for the proximal markers was 8 10%.
However, authors reported a maximum relative error for Eqs.
Maximum relative deviations were 2.13%, 2.91%, and 2.13%, respectively.
The maximum relative standard deviation (RSD) of 4.8% was obtained.
