Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
These two runs provide the maximum recall we can achieve, since no validation process was employed.
Rather the maximum recall ceiling lies at roughly 74 % when (p=1) and increases to approximately 81%% when (p ge 6).
Minimum recall number 57 Minimum recall percentage 90.5% Maximum recall number 63 Maximum recall percentage 100% Recall number standard deviation 1.3 Mean recall number 60.4 Mean recall percentage 95.9% Mean recall percentage interval 93.8%–97.9% Table 9 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study A1 and psychoacoustic descriptors.
The results of these two runs (3 and 3*) establish in fact the maximum recall value that can be expected with our approach, as they result in a non-filtered list which the validation step trims down.
Four weeks is the maximum recall period that is recommended for this type of questionnaire [32], is suited to the effects of therapy on a chronic illness [33] and is also used in well-known PROMs such as the SF-36 [34].
For each disease, we computed the maximum precision and maximum recall separately across the 13 methods.
Similar(50)
The maximum-recall ceiling lies below 100%% because not all tags in the test set occur in the training data.
Moreover, since many test tweets have more than one hashtag, for small values of p, some tags will necessarily go unmatched, even if they would be recalled for larger values of p. The maximum-recall ceiling reaches an asymptote near (p=6) since very few tweets in the test set have more than six hashtags to recall.
For 7 GS searches the maximum relative recall of 100% was measured.
Thirty minutes later, the subjects performed the long delay free recall (maximum score = 15) and long delay recognition (maximum score = 15).
The right column plots the best Jaccard similarity obtained with Multiresolution Deltacom at resolution t (its maximum being the recall).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com