Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Similarly to the kappa metric (Fleiss, 1971), we normalize the POG score between two DEG lists (with lengths l1 and l2) as the proportion of the observed scores beyond chance to the corresponding maximum potential scores beyond chance as follows: (4) where k is the observed number of the shared genes between the two DEG lists.
Similar(59)
Assuming a maximum potential score of 30 (3 centrality measures multiplied by the individual score of 10), the deviation from the maximum score was calculated for each feature.
Figure 4 shows for each community the average deviation from the maximum potential score of 30 (horizontal lines) and the variable ranking distribution for each centrality measure (vertical bars).
All NS and HA scores are expressed as a percent of the maximum potential score.
There was a total of six questions assessing affective perspective-taking, yielding a maximum potential score of 12.
Each component of the three dimensions was awarded 1 point if the paper achieved the minimum defined requirement and cumulative scores for each paper were calculated with a maximum potential score of 11.
If an item was rated 1 4 (i.e. 'not at all important' to 'neither important or unimportant' a 0 score was awarded. The scores of each individual item included in a given subscale was divided by the maximum potential score (i.e. 3) and multiplied by 100, giving a potential range for the barrier score of 0 to 100.
Each subsection consists of 48 figures, and participants had 90 seconds a subsection to complete as many items as possible; this gave a maximum potential score of 144 and a minimum score of 0. Subsections were administered in a counterbalanced sequence to account for order effects.
Each item is scored on a standardized ordinal scale from one (completely dependent) to seven (fully independent) for a maximum potential total score of 126.
Therefore the maximum potential PDI score is 105, with a minimum of 15 [ 27].
The improvements of BBS and FAC were computed as percentages of actual improvement with respect to the maximum potential improvement, {[(discharge score − initial score)/(maximum score − initial score)] × 100} [ 18].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com