Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The percentage of scale scores that were the maximum possible (ceiling) value ranged from 0 to 51.3%; the percentage for all multi-item measures was < 37%.
Floor or ceiling effects at baseline were determined to assess the proportions of patients with the minimum possible (floor) or maximum possible (ceiling) values for individual FSS items and FSS total scores, and were considered present when more than 14.3% (calculated as 100/7, reflecting the 7 possible response categories for the FSS) of patients achieved these values.
Similar(57)
The maximum possible score (ceiling effect) was common with the HUI but was not seen with the CHQ summary scores.
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval Of the 144 participants, 43 amputees had scores of 40 or higher and 33 (23%) had a maximum possible score (ceiling effect).
Range of measurement was further tested based on the percentage of scores at the extremes of the scaling range, that is, the maximum possible score (ceiling effect) and the minimum possible score (floor effect) [ 21].
Range of measurement was based on the percentage of scores at the extremes of the scaling range, that is, the maximum possible score (ceiling effect) and the minimum possible score (floor effect) [ 29].
The bar on the left of each graph represents the number of subjects with a score of 0 (floor effect); the bar on the right represents the number of subjects with a maximum possible score (ceiling effect).
To assist in identifying acceptability and sensitivity of this measure for this cohort the distribution of scores were explored by calculating the percentage of extreme range scores, that is the maximum possible score (ceiling effect = 100) and the minimum possible score (floor effect = 0) [ 19].
Although the rats reached an asymptotic performance, they did not reach the maximum performance possible (ceiling level).
The percentages of scores at the extremes of the score scale, the floor value (minimum possible score i.e. 0) and the ceiling value (maximum possible score i.e. 100), were described to explore the ability for ITP children to distinguish variations in quality of life.
Characteristics of individual items of the IPAQ were examined by calculating the mean, minimum possible and maximum possible response (i.e., floor and ceiling effects), range, item frequency and item- to-item correlations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com