Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The maximum photoconversion efficiencies of the TNTAs, TNTAs/QDs, TNTAs/QDs/10 cycles ZnO, TNTAs/QDs/25 cycles TiO2, and TNTAs/QDs/30 cycles Al2O3 electrodes are 0.06, 2.57, 3.95, 3.41, and 4.23% respectively.
Similar(59)
The maximum photoconversion efficiency of the Ag2S 8)/ZnO/TNT electrode is about 1.3 times that of the Ag2S 8)/TNT electrode.
Finally, a two layered bulk heterojunction structure with P3HT PCBM was successfully demonstrated, leading to a maximum photoconversion efficiency of 3.1%.
The maximum photoconversion efficiency of 25.5% was observed for the 9 h annealed TNT sample on illumination.
Under visible light irradiation, the photocurrent density (at 1.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl) and maximum photoconversion efficiency generated by the annealed nanoporous film were 3.45 mandm2 and 0.91%, respectively.
The maximum photoconversion efficiency was 0.598%, which was obviously more than 2-fold higher than the undoped one (0.257%) under the same supporting electrolyte solution.
TiO2 anodized with 0.50 wt% of NH4F concentration for 60 min exhibited highest hydrogen evolution of 2.53 mL h−1cm−2 and maximum photoconversion efficiency of 4.39%.
A maximum photoconversion efficiency of 2.81% is achieved for the CdS/TNTAs prepared by CV electrodeposition, which exhibits about 17 times enhancement over the efficiency of the sample prepared by DC electrodeposition.
A maximum photoconversion efficiency of 3.33% has been obtained with the total absence of organic solvents, and a good stability has been demonstrated during more than 8 hours of exposition (replicated over months) to simulated solar light.
In particular, a maximum photoconversion efficiency of 0.28% was obtained at an applied potential of -0.67 V vs. Ag/AgCl for the Ag2S 8)/ZnO/TNT electrode, while it was 0.22% for the Ag2S 8)/TNT electrode at an applied potential of -0.67 V.
The maximum photoconversion efficiency was 0.54%, which was 2.7 times the photoconversion efficiency of undoped TiO2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com