Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
When comparing the subjective ratings to the maximum objective hardness value, the percentage of agreement was 50% (n = 18) and the level of concordance remained as moderate to substantial.
Similar(59)
This result was based on the increased agreement of 9/13 for the 'very soft' ratings with minimum hardness objective values compared to 7/13 for the same category with the average or maximum objective values.
Figure 2 Level of agreement between the subjective hardness ratings and the objective hardness measures ( n = 36 assessment pairs).
Notice that the objective value is decreasing towards the maximum objective.
Objective hardness and soil moisture measurements were collected at nine locations (Twomey et al. [2012a]) on the same grounds the day before matches by an independent experienced operator.
Figure 3 Level of agreement between the grassed and bare subjective moisture ratings and the shallow and deep average objective hardness measures ( n = 36 pairs).
Then, Genetic Algorithm (GA) was used to find optimum aging time and temperature for the target of maximum hardness value.
The maximum coating hardness was obtained at high spark energies.
The maximum scratch hardness is 90 GPa.
The bearing plates and rollers were heat-treated to maximum possible hardness, to minimize local deformations.
The results show that the maximum average hardness value of 116 ± 5 Hv was measured for Al 20 wt% Ni50Ti50 composite.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com