Table 3 Descriptive statistics of teachers' essay writing task scores N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Variance 103 3.00 7.50 4.68 1.03 1.07 Fig. 3 Teachers' essay writing task scores.
Table 2 Descriptive statistics of teachers' letter writing task scores N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Variance 103 3.00 7.50 4.43.94.88 Fig. 2 Teachers' letter writing task scores.
Table 5 Descriptive statistics of teachers' assessment of sample essay writing task N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Variance 103 3.00 8.50 5.45 1.34 1.79 Fig. 5 Teachers' assessment of sample essay writing task.
Of note was that the minimum and maximum scores were 3 and 8. Table 4 Descriptive statistics of teachers' assessment of sample letter writing task N Minimum Maximum Mean SD Variance 103 3.00 8.00 5.83 1.24 1.55 Fig. 4 Teachers' assessment of sample letter writing task.
This approach ensured that each of the approximating random variables shown in table 1 matched the minimum, maximum, mean and variance of the observed variables.
To show the queue delay property precisely, Table 4 presents the queue delay statistics in terms of maximum, minimum, mean, variance, and standard deviation of the flow among three algorithms.
The results of the basic descriptive statistics (maximum, minimum, range, mean, variance, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis) that further describe the dataset are presented in Table 1.
To confirm the accuracy of plausible values in each condition, we show the minimum, average, and maximum means and variances of 12 factors in Table 5.
We use mean, variance and maximum of this property in the feature set.
Descriptive statistics including the number of tests graded, number of graded items, total score possible, maximum score, minimum score, median, mean, variance, and standard deviation were calculated for both the pretest and posttest cognitive scores (Table 1).
